TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

18.4.3 Slave Trades

OCR Specification focus:
‘The slave trades ; the balance sheet’

Introduction
The development of the slave trades between the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries played a transformative role in shaping European overseas expansion, generating profound political, economic, and social consequences.

Early Origins of the Slave Trades

From the mid-fifteenth century, European powers, particularly Portugal and later Spain, initiated the large-scale trade of enslaved peoples. Initially, this centred on Africa’s Atlantic coastline, where Portuguese merchants and explorers established trading posts. The Portuguese began transporting enslaved Africans to work on sugar plantations in Madeira, the Azores, and eventually Brazil. This marked the transition of slavery from a regional system to a global enterprise linked directly to European colonial expansion.

Ottoman Expansion and Context

The Ottoman Empire’s control of Mediterranean trade routes encouraged Europeans to seek alternative economic opportunities through maritime ventures. One solution was the exploitation of enslaved labour, particularly as plantation agriculture expanded in the Atlantic islands and later the Americas. Enslaved Africans became a crucial commodity, aligning with both European economic ambitions and the demographic decline of indigenous populations in the Americas due to disease and conquest.

The Structure of the Slave Trades

By the sixteenth century, the transatlantic slave system was emerging, although not yet at the scale seen in later centuries.

A simplified map of the triangular trade linking Europe, West and Central Africa, and the Americas. Arrows indicate the movement of enslaved people across the Atlantic and the counter-flow of commodities and profits to Europe. Source

European traders acquired enslaved individuals primarily through African intermediaries and coastal elites in exchange for goods such as textiles, metals, and firearms. The enslaved were then transported across the Atlantic, with their forced labour underpinning the growing plantation economies.

  • Portuguese dominance: Pioneered the Atlantic slave trade, supplying enslaved Africans to Iberian colonies.

  • Spanish involvement: Spain’s American conquests created a demand for labour, formalised through the asiento system (royal licences granting merchants the right to supply enslaved Africans).

  • African agency: Some African rulers actively participated, leveraging the trade to consolidate regional power, though this also destabilised many societies.

Definitions of Key Concepts

Asiento: A contract granted by the Spanish crown allowing individuals or companies to supply enslaved Africans to Spanish colonies.

The asiento demonstrates how European states institutionalised the trade, embedding it into the administrative and financial structures of empire.

Economic Dimensions of the Slave Trades

The slave trades were not only a human tragedy but also a commercial system that benefited multiple actors across continents. For European patrons, profits derived from:

  • The sale of enslaved people in the Americas.

  • The productivity of slave labour in plantations, especially sugar.

  • Secondary markets in Europe, where colonial goods like sugar and tobacco reshaped consumption patterns.

The balance sheet of the slave trades highlights uneven distributions of wealth and loss:

  • European beneficiaries: Monarchs, merchants, and investors profited through taxation, trade monopolies, and commodities.

  • African participants: Some elites gained short-term wealth and military power, but long-term consequences included demographic loss and political destabilisation.

  • Enslaved individuals: Suffered displacement, brutal working conditions, and cultural erasure. Their forced labour produced the economic gains for others.

Political and Social Impacts in Europe

The slave trades contributed to the shifting European balance of power. Portugal’s early dominance brought wealth but was soon challenged by Spain’s vast American empire. Both kingdoms relied heavily on enslaved labour to sustain expansion. The increasing reliance on the trade laid the groundwork for later rivalries with emerging European powers such as England and the Netherlands.

Socially, the influx of wealth from enslaved labour altered class structures. Merchants and financiers linked to the trades rose in status, while the ideological justification for enslavement drew on religious and pseudo-scientific arguments, reinforcing racial hierarchies.

Consequences for Africa and the Americas

The forced migration of Africans created profound demographic shifts, especially along the western and central African coasts. While some regions adapted economically, others experienced population depletion, warfare, and dependency on European goods. The Americas, meanwhile, became laboratories of cultural blending and exploitation. Enslaved Africans carried traditions, languages, and religions, which intermingled with indigenous and European influences, forming distinctive colonial societies.

The Balance Sheet of Benefits and Losses

The term balance sheet captures the dual reality of the slave trades: immense profits for European empires and catastrophic losses for enslaved peoples and many African societies.

  • Benefits (Europe): Financial enrichment, access to commodities, expansion of empire.

  • Losses (Africa and enslaved): Human suffering, cultural dislocation, increased conflict.

  • Ambiguities: Some African rulers gained materially, but such gains rarely offset the broader devastation.

Religious and Moral Dimensions

Religion was frequently invoked to justify or contest the slave trades. Some Europeans argued that enslavement offered opportunities for conversion to Christianity, casting it as a civilising mission. Others, including churchmen and reformers, began to criticise the trade’s brutality. The moral debate, while limited in this period, foreshadowed later abolitionist arguments.

Long-Term Significance

Although the OCR specification focuses on the sixteenth century, the early patterns of the slave trades laid during this period provided the structural foundation for the much larger system of transatlantic slavery that dominated later centuries. This early stage illustrates how exploration, conquest, and colonisation were inseparable from the systematic exploitation of enslaved human beings, with legacies that endured for generations.

FAQ

African intermediaries, often coastal rulers or traders, acted as suppliers of enslaved people to Europeans. They captured or purchased individuals from inland regions and exchanged them for goods such as textiles, firearms, or metalware.

This role gave some African elites short-term wealth and power, but it also fuelled conflicts and wars within the continent, destabilising societies and increasing dependency on European trade.


Sugar plantations required intensive labour, far beyond what voluntary migration or indigenous populations could sustain. Europeans turned to enslaved Africans to meet this demand.

Sugar’s profitability made it a cornerstone of the emerging plantation economy. The wealth generated from sugar exports encouraged European patrons to expand the trade further and institutionalise systems like the asiento to secure a steady supply of enslaved labour.


The profits from the slave trades fed directly into European financial structures.

  • Royal treasuries benefited from customs duties and monopoly rights.

  • Merchants reinvested profits into further voyages or urban development.

  • Some of the earliest joint-stock companies drew on the slave trades as a secure, lucrative source of returns, strengthening financial institutions in Portugal and Spain.

The forced export of people disproportionately affected coastal and central African regions. Populations in some areas declined sharply due to repeated raids and sales into slavery.

Meanwhile, other regions experienced population shifts as communities fled slave-raiding zones or sought refuge inland. These demographic changes disrupted traditional societies and contributed to long-term economic and social instability.


Yes, some early criticism emerged, though limited in influence.

  • Certain Christian theologians, such as Bartolomé de las Casas, condemned the brutal treatment of enslaved peoples, though he initially proposed replacing indigenous labour with Africans.

  • Small groups of clerics and reformers questioned whether the practice aligned with Christian morality, sowing seeds for later debates.

These voices did not halt the trade but revealed early tensions between profit, conquest, and conscience.


Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks):
Identify two European powers involved in the early development of the transatlantic slave trades during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.


Mark Scheme:

  • 1 mark for each correctly identified European power.

  • Correct answers include: Portugal and Spain.
    (Maximum 2 marks)

Question 2 (6 marks):
Explain two ways in which the slave trades contributed to the economic balance sheet of Europe in the sixteenth century.


Mark Scheme:

  • Award up to 3 marks for each well-explained factor, linked to the economic balance sheet.

  • Explanations must demonstrate understanding of the link between the trade and economic consequences.

Indicative content:

  • Profits from enslaved labour and plantation economies: European patrons benefited from the productivity of sugar and other crops produced by enslaved Africans. (1 mark for identification, 2 marks for clear explanation)

  • Growth of trade and taxation revenues: Monarchs and merchants profited from taxation, monopolies, and the sale of commodities produced by enslaved labour. (1 mark for identification, 2 marks for explanation)

  • Other valid responses include the development of new markets in Europe for sugar, tobacco, and other colonial goods.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email