OCR Specification focus:
‘The assassination of Henry III (1589) complicated accession; by 1593 legitimacy questions persisted.’
Henry III’s assassination in 1589 created a profound crisis of succession. Henry of Navarre, a Protestant, faced hostility, war, and religious opposition that delayed his secure accession.
The Assassination of Henry III, 1589
The death of Henry III, the last Valois king, marked a decisive turning point in the French monarchy. Assassinated by a Catholic monk, Jacques Clément, in August 1589, his death created an immediate succession crisis.

Engraved representation of the assassination of Henry III by Jacques Clément at Saint-Cloud, August 1589. The scene marks the end of the Valois line and illustrates the beginning of Henry of Navarre’s contested succession. Source
According to hereditary principles, Henry of Navarre (later Henry IV) became the rightful heir as the senior Bourbon, but his Protestant faith posed severe obstacles in a kingdom torn by religious conflict.
The Problem of Legitimacy
Henry’s accession was legally justified by Salic Law, which excluded female succession and preserved Bourbon rights. However, legitimacy extended beyond legality—it required acceptance by the nobility, Church, and population.
The Catholic League, led by the powerful Guise family and supported by Spain, rejected his claim due to his Protestantism.
Many cities, especially Paris, refused to recognise him as king.
Papal hostility further undermined his position, as the pope refused to acknowledge him.
Legitimacy: The recognition of a monarch’s lawful right to rule, combining legal, religious, and social acceptance.
Henry thus inherited not only a crown but also an enduring conflict over religion and authority.
Henry of Navarre’s Early Challenges
Religious Hostility
Henry’s Protestant identity alienated much of Catholic France. Opposition centred on the idea that a heretic king could not rule a Catholic kingdom. Theologians and clerics, influenced by the Counter-Reformation, declared obedience to him unlawful.
Military Resistance
Henry’s rule was immediately challenged on the battlefield. His forces confronted the Catholic League, which drew support from:
Spanish troops under Philip II
Urban militias loyal to Catholic orthodoxy
Influential noble factions hostile to Bourbon leadership
Henry’s military victories, such as Ivry (1590), demonstrated his capability, but they did not secure decisive nationwide control.
The Role of the Catholic League
The Catholic League became the central obstacle to Henry’s accession. Their demands were simple: no Protestant king. They:
Controlled Paris and major cities.
Enjoyed Spanish financial and military backing.
Advanced alternative claimants, including Cardinal Charles of Bourbon (styled as “Charles X”).
By 1590–1591, Henry appeared strong militarily but weak politically, unable to enter the capital or gain recognition.
Spanish Intervention
Philip II of Spain exploited the French succession crisis to weaken France. He supported the League, deployed troops, and even attempted to press a claim through his daughter, the Infanta Isabella. This foreign involvement deepened Henry’s legitimacy crisis.
The Conversion Question
Henry’s religion was the decisive issue in the succession conflict. Initially, he resisted conversion, declaring he would not betray his conscience. Yet political realities forced reconsideration. By 1593, it was clear that without Catholic acceptance he could not govern effectively.
Conversion: The act of formally changing religious allegiance. For Henry, conversion from Calvinist Protestantism to Catholicism became essential for widespread acceptance.
Henry’s famous decision—reportedly declaring “Paris is worth a Mass”—reflected political pragmatism. His conversion in 1593 opened the path to reconciliation with much of Catholic France.

Engraving of Henry IV’s abjuration at Saint-Denis in July 1593. This public renunciation of Calvinism was pivotal in restoring Catholic recognition of his rule and securing his legitimacy. Source
The Papacy and International Dynamics
Papal excommunication had previously excluded Henry from Catholic legitimacy. His conversion altered this dynamic. By 1595, Pope Clement VIII formally absolved him, recognising him as King of France. This was a crucial step in consolidating his authority.
Meanwhile, the Spanish threat remained significant until the eventual peace settlement with Spain in 1598. The interplay between domestic legitimacy and international rivalry defined Henry’s accession struggles.
Accession Complications 1589–1593
Henry’s path to the throne illustrates the fragility of French monarchy in the late sixteenth century. Between 1589 and 1593, his position remained precarious because:
He lacked recognition from the Church.
The Catholic League controlled major regions.
Spain actively undermined his claim.
His Protestantism divided his supporters.
Key Developments
1589: Death of Henry III; Navarre claims throne.
1590: Victory at Ivry; continued resistance in Paris.
1591–1592: Entrenched warfare; Spanish influence grows.
1593: Conversion to Catholicism; key turning point in gaining acceptance.
The Broader Implications
Henry’s accession problems highlight the close link between religion and monarchy in France. His struggle demonstrated:
The limitations of hereditary principle when challenged by confessional conflict.
The role of foreign intervention in shaping French politics.
The necessity of political compromise, exemplified by conversion, in establishing stable rule.
In essence, Henry’s path from 1589 to 1593 encapsulates the broader crisis of legitimacy in a nation fractured by civil war and religious division. By navigating this precarious period, Henry laid the foundations for restored monarchy and eventual stability, though only after immense struggle.
FAQ
Clément was a Dominican lay brother radicalised by the Catholic League’s propaganda. He viewed Henry III as a traitor for siding with Henry of Navarre and weakening Catholic resistance.
The assassination was seen by Catholic extremists as a divinely sanctioned act. However, it shocked moderates, as killing an anointed king challenged the sacred nature of monarchy.
Henry adopted the title “King of France” immediately after Henry III’s death, emphasising his legal right to the throne.
He also issued promises of religious toleration and appealed to moderate Catholics known as politiques, who valued stability over confessional purity.
This pragmatic approach aimed to weaken the Catholic League’s hold on France.
Both sides used printed pamphlets, sermons, and images to frame Henry’s legitimacy.
The Catholic League produced works portraying him as a heretic and illegitimate usurper.
Henry’s supporters promoted his hereditary right and stressed the dangers of foreign interference by Spain.
These campaigns were crucial in winning, or alienating, public opinion.
Noble allegiance was fragmented by personal ties and regional loyalties.
Some feared losing influence to the Bourbons.
Others aligned with the Catholic League to safeguard privileges.
Many simply waited to see which side gained the upper hand before committing.
This hesitancy reflected the weakness of central authority during the succession crisis.
Philip II of Spain sought to exploit the crisis by backing the Catholic League. He hoped to place his daughter, Isabella, on the French throne.
This intervention alarmed some French Catholics, who feared domination by Spain. Over time, the prospect of foreign rule encouraged moderates to rally behind Henry once he converted.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
In what year did Henry IV formally convert to Catholicism to strengthen his legitimacy as king of France?
Mark Scheme:
1 mark for identifying that Henry IV converted in 1593.
1 additional mark for identifying that the event took place at Saint-Denis.
Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain two reasons why Henry IV’s accession after the assassination of Henry III in 1589 was contested.
Mark Scheme:
Up to 3 marks for each reason explained (maximum 6).
Award 1 mark for identifying a valid reason, 1 mark for description, and 1 mark for explanation of its significance.
Indicative content:
Reason 1: Religion — Henry was a Protestant (Calvinist), which alienated Catholic France; many contemporaries argued a heretic could not rule a Catholic kingdom. (1 mark identification, 1 mark description, 1 mark explanation)
Reason 2: Opposition of the Catholic League — The League, supported by Spain, controlled Paris and major regions, rejecting Henry’s claim; this weakened his authority and legitimacy. (1+1+1 marks)
Other valid reasons could include papal excommunication, Spanish intervention, or alternative claimants promoted by the League.