OCR Specification focus:
‘Economic change influenced nationalism and the prospects for political unity.’
Introduction
The nineteenth century saw economic transformation across the German lands. Economic change not only reshaped society but also strengthened demands for national unity and political cohesion.
Economic Modernisation and its Influence on Unity
Economic modernisation was a central driver in reshaping German society during the nineteenth century. As industries expanded, agriculture evolved, and new technologies spread, the interconnectedness of the German states deepened. This made cooperation between states not only desirable but necessary, linking economic progress directly to the question of national identity.
The rise of urbanisation and industrial centres created cross-regional economic links.
Growing trade required reduced barriers, encouraging cooperation.
Shared economic challenges and opportunities fostered mutual reliance among German states.
Economic Nationalism
Economic nationalism — the deliberate use of policies to foster growth and independence — became a vital force. German intellectuals and policymakers increasingly argued that prosperity required cooperation across political boundaries.
Economic Nationalism: The policy of using state power to encourage economic development, protect domestic industries, and promote collective prosperity across national or regional boundaries.
Economic nationalism was both an ideological tool and a practical necessity, pushing rulers and elites to consider broader political unity.
The Zollverein and Economic Integration
The creation of the Zollverein (Customs Union, 1834) marked a turning point.

A colour-coded map of the Deutscher Zollverein within the German Confederation. It distinguishes the 1834 core and later accessions, highlighting Prussia’s central role in economic integration. Source
By abolishing tariffs between member states and establishing common external duties, the Zollverein:
Stimulated internal trade across German lands.
Fostered economic interdependence, reducing reliance on Austria and other external markets.
Encouraged a sense of shared economic destiny among participating states.
The Zollverein excluded Austria, symbolising its declining role within German economic affairs. This strengthened Prussian leadership and gave Prussia a central role in shaping both economic and political integration.
Industrialisation and the Push for Unity
The industrial revolution intensified demands for national integration. Expanding industries required large, unified markets, as fragmented borders and tariffs restricted efficiency.
Textiles, coal, and iron industries benefited from open internal markets.
Railway expansion accelerated economic growth and physically linked disparate regions.
Industrialisation encouraged the rise of a politically conscious middle class who demanded greater participation in shaping economic and political policies.
Middle Class (Bürgertum): A social group, often industrialists, merchants, and professionals, that emerged with economic modernisation, advocating liberal reforms and national unity.
Industrialisation therefore aligned economic interest with political goals, creating pressure for constitutional reforms and closer integration.
Railways as Engines of Integration
Railways were particularly transformative. They linked distant states, accelerated trade, and allowed for the rapid movement of goods, people, and ideas.
By the 1850s:
Railway networks connected Prussia to southern and western German states, fostering cross-regional economic ties

An 1849 railway map of Germany and neighbouring lands. The spread of railways across state borders illustrates the infrastructure that accelerated economic interdependence and strengthened unity. Source
The circulation of newspapers and pamphlets increased, reinforcing a shared cultural and political consciousness.
The mobility of workers and soldiers created a sense of common experience, aligning with nationalist sentiment.
Thus, railways became not only physical infrastructure but also symbolic of the momentum towards unity.
Economic Debates: Free Trade vs. Protection
Economic change provoked debate over whether Germany’s prosperity required free trade or protectionist policies.
Free traders argued that openness to global markets would maximise growth.
Protectionists believed that tariffs were essential to safeguard industries against British competition.
These debates intersected with nationalism:
Protectionist policies were often justified in terms of strengthening Germany’s independence from foreign influence.
Free trade advocates argued that integration within Germany was a prerequisite for competing internationally.
Economy and the Prospects of Political Unity
By the mid-nineteenth century, economic change had made the idea of German unity increasingly practical. Economic interdependence reduced the viability of political fragmentation, as states risked being left behind if they resisted integration.
Several key ways in which the economy influenced unity include:
Prussia’s economic dominance through the Zollverein positioned it as the natural leader of German unification.
The growing middle-class demand for liberal constitutions linked economic modernisation to political reform.
Railways and industrialisation created common structures and shared challenges, binding states together.
Prussia’s Role
Prussia’s leadership in economic matters translated into political leadership. Its ability to exclude Austria from the Zollverein highlighted the shift in power dynamics and prepared the ground for the later political unification of Germany in 1871.
Prussia’s strong fiscal base, advanced industries, and military efficiency owed much to its economic modernisation. These strengths ultimately enabled it to dominate the unification process.
Conclusion: The Economy as a Foundation of Nationalism
Economic change provided both the means and the rationale for German unification. While culture and politics fuelled nationalism, the practical necessities of trade, industry, and modern infrastructure ensured that unity was not merely an ideal but a growing necessity. As such, the economy did not merely accompany the nationalist project; it actively shaped and propelled it forward.
FAQ
Austria’s absence from the Zollverein weakened its ability to shape the economic future of the German states. Without membership, it lost a crucial role in fostering interdependence and fell behind Prussia’s economic dominance.
This decline in influence meant Austria struggled to maintain leadership within the German Confederation, setting the stage for Prussia to become the driving force of unification.
Customs revenues collected through the Zollverein became a vital financial resource for member states. These revenues:
Provided funds for investment in railways and infrastructure.
Reduced dependence on external markets or loans.
Strengthened the fiscal capacity of Prussia, enhancing its authority over smaller states.
This connection between economics and politics reinforced Prussia’s central role in unification.
The middle class benefited most from open internal markets, which expanded opportunities for trade and investment. They also sought liberal reforms to protect property and promote stability.
By linking economic modernisation with demands for constitutional government, they positioned themselves as advocates of a united Germany that could provide both prosperity and political rights.
Smaller states often lacked the resources to modernise independently. Economic integration through the Zollverein gave them access to larger markets and cheaper goods.
However, this also increased their dependence on Prussia, as tariffs and economic policy were increasingly set from Berlin, limiting their political autonomy while binding them to Prussian-led unity.
Railways reduced travel times dramatically, making it easier for ideas, newspapers, and cultural practices to circulate. Shared festivals, exhibitions, and political meetings became accessible to wider audiences.
This fostered a growing sense of common identity and cultural belonging across regions that had previously been isolated, strengthening the foundations of national unity alongside economic integration.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
What was the Zollverein and why was it significant for German unity?
Mark Scheme:
1 mark for identifying the Zollverein as a customs union/economic alliance of German states (not Austria) created in 1834.
1 mark for explaining its significance, e.g., by noting it reduced tariffs/barriers, encouraged trade, or fostered economic interdependence that supported political unity.
Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain how industrialisation and the growth of railways encouraged German unity in the nineteenth century.
Mark Scheme:
1 mark for reference to industrialisation creating demand for larger markets/unity.
1 mark for linking industrial growth to the emergence of a politically active middle class pressing for reform/unity.
1 mark for noting the expansion of industries such as coal, iron, and textiles requiring integrated economic networks.
1 mark for stating that railways physically connected German states and accelerated trade.
1 mark for explaining how railways spread ideas/newspapers, fostering common identity and political consciousness.
1 mark for identifying how improved mobility (workers, soldiers) promoted shared experiences and greater interdependence.