TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

51.3.2 External Pressures and Austria’s Decline

OCR Specification focus:
‘External circumstances, including Austria’s decline, shifted balances within Germany.’

External pressures and Austria’s decline profoundly influenced the balance of power within German lands, reshaping political alignments, national ambitions, and the direction of unification throughout the nineteenth century.

Austria’s Traditional Dominance

For centuries, Austria had been the leading German-speaking power, dominating the Holy Roman Empire and maintaining authority within the German Confederation after 1815. This dominance rested on:

  • Austria’s dynastic prestige under the Habsburg monarchy

  • Control of extensive, multinational territories across Central and Eastern Europe

  • Influence in European diplomacy through the Congress of Vienna (1815)

German Confederation: A loose association of 39 German states formed in 1815 under Austrian presidency, intended to coordinate security and maintain conservative order.

Yet this dominance was increasingly challenged by external and internal pressures.

External Pressures Weakening Austria

The Napoleonic Legacy

The Napoleonic Wars disrupted established authority, and although Austria regained influence after 1815, the dismantling of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 left a legacy of weakened legitimacy. Napoleon’s reshaping of borders also planted seeds of German nationalism, which Austria struggled to harness.

The Crimean War (1853–1856)

Austria’s hesitant diplomacy during the Crimean War alienated both Russia and France.

  • Austria failed to support Russia, its traditional ally.

  • France resented Austrian caution, while Britain mistrusted its manoeuvring.
    This left Austria diplomatically isolated, with fewer external supports to defend its interests in Germany.

The Austro-Prussian Rivalry

The rise of Prussia as an industrial and military power after 1815 posed a constant external pressure:

  • Prussia’s leadership of the Zollverein (customs union) excluded Austria and strengthened Prussian influence.

File:Zollvereinkarte.svg

This labelled map depicts the German Customs Union (Zollverein) from 1834, highlighting member states and phases of accession. Austria is notably outside the union, illustrating its economic isolation from the core German market. The map includes later accessions, which is useful context but extends beyond the immediate syllabus focus. Source

  • Military reforms and economic growth gave Prussia increasing leverage in German affairs.

  • Austria, meanwhile, remained economically backward, lacking integration into modernised networks.

Austria’s Internal Weaknesses

A Multinational Empire

Austria was not a purely German state but a multinational empire encompassing Hungarians, Czechs, Italians, Croats, and others.

  • Rising nationalist movements within the empire demanded autonomy or independence.

  • German nationalism within Austria itself clashed with the interests of other ethnic groups.

Multinational Empire: A state composed of several different nationalities with distinct languages, cultures, and political aspirations.

This complexity diverted Austrian resources away from German affairs, weakening its ability to lead.

Economic Stagnation

Austria’s economy lagged behind Prussia:

  • Limited industrialisation compared to the Ruhr or Silesia.

  • Weak infrastructure development, particularly in railways.

  • Reliance on outdated feudal agricultural systems.
    This stagnation undermined Austria’s appeal as a unifying force for a modern Germany.

Key Turning Points in Austria’s Decline

Revolutions of 1848

Austria’s vulnerability became clear during the 1848 revolutions:

  • Liberal and nationalist uprisings paralysed Vienna.

  • Hungarian and Czech movements exposed ethnic fragility.

  • Though Austria ultimately reasserted control under Schwarzenberg and the army, its reliance on repression damaged credibility as Germany’s conservative guardian.

The Austro-Prussian War (1866)

The decisive moment in Austria’s decline came with the Austro-Prussian War (also known as the Seven Weeks’ War):

File:Map-AustroPrussianWar.svg

This diagram shows member-state alignments in 1866: Prussia and allies, Austria and allies, neutral states, and disputed territories. It visually explains how internal German states divided under external pressure, underpinning Prussia’s pathway to leadership. Colours are clear and labels minimal, suitable for quick comprehension. Source

  • Prussia, led by Bismarck, defeated Austria at the Battle of Königgrätz.

  • The war excluded Austria from German affairs and dissolved the German Confederation.

  • The North German Confederation (1867) formed under Prussian leadership, demonstrating Austria’s eclipse.

Shifting Balances Within Germany

Rise of Prussia

As Austria declined, Prussia consolidated dominance through:

  • Military victories (Denmark 1864, Austria 1866, France 1870–71).

  • Economic leadership via the Zollverein.

  • Diplomatic skill of Bismarck, exploiting Austria’s weakness to isolate it from allies.

Decline of Austrian Influence

Austria’s exclusion meant:

  • German nationalists increasingly turned to the Kleindeutsch solution (unification without Austria).

  • The idea of a Grossdeutsch solution (including Austria) became unrealistic due to the empire’s ethnic diversity.

  • Austria redirected its ambitions towards its Balkan and Central European empire rather than German unity.

Kleindeutsch: A model of German unification excluding Austria, focused on Prussian leadership.

Grossdeutsch: A model of German unification including Austria, reflecting broader Habsburg traditions.

Consequences of Austria’s Decline

  • Political Realignment: German unity progressed under Prussia, reshaping political balances in central Europe.

  • National Identity: The exclusion of Austria shaped the nature of German nationalism into a narrower, more Prussian-focused identity.

  • Austrian Priorities: Austria concentrated on its empire’s survival and later on managing tensions with Hungary and Balkan states.

Wider European Context

Austria’s decline was not only a German phenomenon but also a European one:

  • Loss of prestige after 1859 (defeated by France and Piedmont in Italy).

  • Repeated isolation in European diplomacy.

  • Inability to project power effectively outside its own borders.

In this way, external circumstances and Austria’s decline decisively shifted balances within Germany, opening the way for Prussia to assume leadership in the eventual unification process.

FAQ

Austria’s empire included Hungarians, Czechs, Italians, Croats, and Poles, each with competing demands.

Managing these diverse nationalities drained financial and military resources, leaving fewer means to assert dominance within the German Confederation. In contrast, Prussia’s more homogeneous population allowed it to focus on external expansion and leadership.

Austria’s refusal to back Russia during the Crimean War alienated its traditional ally.

France and Britain also viewed Austria with suspicion, leaving it without reliable partners. This diplomatic weakness meant Austria could not count on external support when challenged by Prussia in 1866, accelerating its decline in Germany.

Many middle-sized states, such as Bavaria, Saxony, and Hanover, were historically aligned with Austria.

However, after 1866, Prussia’s military power forced these states into the North German Confederation or made them reconsider their loyalties. Austria’s failure to retain their trust revealed its waning authority within Germany.

The battle decisively ended Austrian hopes of leading German unity.

Prussia’s modern military organisation, especially its railways and the breech-loading needle gun, secured rapid victory. Austria’s loss demonstrated its military inferiority and confirmed Prussia as the dominant force in German affairs.

Austria suffered a setback at the hands of France and Piedmont-Sardinia in 1859 during the Second Italian War of Independence.

This defeat weakened its prestige and encouraged nationalist movements within the empire. It also signalled to German states that Austria was vulnerable internationally, diminishing confidence in its leadership within the German Confederation.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks)
Name two external pressures that weakened Austria’s position in German affairs during the nineteenth century.


Mark Scheme:

  • 1 mark for identifying each correct external pressure.

  • Acceptable answers include:

    • Austria’s diplomatic isolation after the Crimean War.

    • Austria’s defeat in the Austro-Prussian War (1866).

    • Prussia’s economic dominance through the Zollverein.

    • Growing influence of Prussia’s military and industrial strength.
      (Maximum 2 marks)

Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain how Austria’s internal weaknesses contributed to its declining influence in Germany in the nineteenth century.


Mark Scheme:

  • Award up to 2 marks for identifying relevant weaknesses.

  • Award up to 2 marks for describing or explaining those weaknesses.

  • Award up to 2 marks for linking these weaknesses to Austria’s reduced influence in German affairs.

Indicative content may include:

  • Austria was a multinational empire, with rising nationalist movements (e.g., Hungarians, Czechs) which diverted resources away from German affairs.

  • Austria’s economic stagnation, with limited industrialisation and underdeveloped infrastructure, contrasted with Prussia’s modernisation.

  • The internal strain from the 1848 revolutions weakened Austria’s credibility as Germany’s conservative guardian.

  • These weaknesses undermined Austria’s capacity to lead or compete with Prussia in shaping German unity.

(Maximum 6 marks)

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email