OCR Specification focus:
‘Sunni and Shi‘a relations shaped politics and society in Arab states.’
The historical division between Sunni and Shi‘a Islam has profoundly influenced Middle Eastern politics, social structures, conflicts and alliances, shaping the modern Arab states and their governance.
Origins of the Sunni–Shi‘a Divide
The split between Sunni and Shi‘a Muslims stems from a seventh-century dispute over leadership succession following the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632 CE.
Sunni Islam: The largest branch of Islam, believing that leadership of the Muslim community (Caliph) should be chosen by consensus from among qualified individuals.
Shi‘a Islam: A branch of Islam that holds leadership should pass through the Prophet Muhammad’s family, particularly to Ali, his cousin and son-in-law.
This schism became institutionalised over centuries, evolving into distinct religious doctrines, legal schools, rituals and political outlooks. Sunni Islam became dominant across most of the Islamic world, while Shi‘a Islam developed strongholds particularly in Persia (modern Iran) and parts of the Arab world.
Demographic Patterns and Geographic Distribution
Sunni Muslims comprise roughly 85–90% of the global Muslim population, while Shi‘a Muslims make up 10–15%, concentrated in:
Iraq – significant Shi‘a majority but historically ruled by Sunni elites until 2003.
Lebanon – large Shi‘a population represented by groups like Hezbollah.
Bahrain – Shi‘a majority under a Sunni monarchy.
Saudi Arabia – Shi‘a minority mainly in the oil-rich Eastern Province.
Yemen – divided between Sunni Shafi‘i and Shi‘a Zaydi communities.
These demographics have shaped state structures, political power dynamics and sectarian relations throughout the Arab world.
Political Power and Sectarian Hierarchies
Sunni Dominance and State Formation
Most Arab states emerged under Sunni leadership, reflecting both demographic majorities and the historical dominance of Sunni caliphal traditions. Monarchies like Jordan and Saudi Arabia and republics such as Egypt and Syria (before the Baathist era) were built upon Sunni political and religious legitimacy.
Key features included:
State-sponsored Sunni religious institutions (e.g., Al-Azhar in Egypt).
Use of Sunni jurisprudence (Sharia schools) as the basis for legal systems.
Marginalisation or suppression of Shi‘a groups to prevent political dissent.
Shi‘a Marginalisation and Resistance
In several states, Shi‘a communities faced discrimination, exclusion from political power, and restrictions on religious practice. This often provoked sectarian resistance movements and calls for reform or autonomy, as seen in:
Iraq under Saddam Hussein, where Shi‘a were politically excluded despite being the majority.
Saudi Arabia, where Shi‘a activism in the Eastern Province challenged state authority, particularly during the 1979 Islamic Revolution in neighbouring Iran.
Bahrain, where Shi‘a protests against Sunni rule culminated in significant unrest during the Arab Spring of 2011.
Revolutionary Change and Shifting Power Balances
The 1979 Iranian Revolution transformed the sectarian landscape of the Middle East. It established a Shi‘a theocracy under Ayatollah Khomeini, promoting the idea of wilayat al-faqih (guardianship of the jurist), which challenged Sunni monarchies and secular regimes.
This revolution inspired Shi‘a movements across the Arab world:
Formation of Hezbollah in Lebanon (1982), blending religious ideology with political militancy.
Shi‘a uprisings in Iraq (1991) and Bahrain (1990s).
Heightened sectarian rivalry in the Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988), where Sunni-led Iraq sought to contain Shi‘a revolutionary influence.
Sectarianism in Modern Conflicts
Sectarian identities have often been manipulated by state and non-state actors to justify policies, mobilise support, or delegitimise rivals. Key examples include:
Iraq Post-2003
The US-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein and shifted power to the Shi‘a majority, leading to:
A Shi‘a-dominated government, provoking Sunni insurgencies and sectarian violence.
Emergence of extremist groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq and later ISIS, which framed their struggle as defence against Shi‘a dominance.
Persistent divisions in politics, security forces, and society.
Syria’s Civil War (2011–)
The conflict deepened Sunni–Shi‘a polarisation:
The Alawite-led Assad regime (an offshoot of Shi‘a Islam) retained power with Iranian and Hezbollah support.
Sunni opposition forces, backed by Gulf states and Turkey, sought regime change.
The war became a proxy battlefield for broader Sunni–Shi‘a and Saudi–Iranian rivalries.
Yemen’s Conflict
Sectarian dynamics underpin the war between:
Sunni-led government forces backed by Saudi Arabia.
Shi‘a Zaydi Houthi rebels supported by Iran.
The conflict illustrates how sectarian identity intertwines with political, tribal and regional disputes.
Religion, Society and Identity
Sectarianism and Social Structures
Sunni and Shi‘a identities shape not only political alignments but also education, law, and social networks. Religious festivals such as Ashura (commemorating Imam Husayn’s martyrdom) are vital to Shi‘a communal identity, while Sunni religious institutions reinforce orthodox interpretations and state legitimacy.

A high-resolution aerial view of pilgrims in Karbala commemorating Ashura, illustrating the scale and communal importance of Shi‘a ritual identity in the Arab world. Source
Cross-Sectarian Cooperation
Despite tensions, there have been instances of cooperation:
Sunni and Shi‘a groups have united against colonial powers, as during the Iraqi revolt of 1920.
Cross-sectarian coalitions formed in Lebanon’s political system, though often fragile and contested.
In some states like Oman, sectarian divisions are less politically significant, demonstrating that identity’s impact varies by context.
The Saudi–Iranian Rivalry and Its Sectarian Dimensions
The geopolitical rivalry between Sunni-majority Saudi Arabia and Shi‘a-majority Iran underpins much of the region’s sectarian polarisation. Each state claims leadership of the Islamic world:
Saudi Arabia projects itself as the guardian of Sunni orthodoxy and the Two Holy Mosques.
Iran promotes Shi‘a revolutionary ideology and support for Shi‘a movements abroad.
This rivalry manifests in proxy conflicts, media narratives and diplomatic alignments, entrenching sectarian identities as tools of statecraft and ideological competition.
Sectarianism and the Arab Spring
The 2011 uprisings reshaped sectarian politics:
Bahrain’s Shi‘a protests were crushed with Saudi assistance, highlighting Sunni fears of Iranian influence.

A high-resolution photograph of Pearl Roundabout during Bahrain’s 2011 protests, showing Shi‘a-led demonstrations against Sunni monarchy and illustrating sectarian dimensions of the Arab Spring. Source
Iraq’s Sunni protests (2012–2013) expressed resentment toward Shi‘a-dominated governance.
Syria’s conflict deepened sectarian divides across the region.
These events show how demands for democracy and reform became intertwined with long-standing sectarian grievances.
Legacy and Continuing Influence
The Sunni–Shi‘a divide continues to shape political legitimacy, alliances, identity, and conflict in Arab states. While deeply rooted in theological differences, it is often politicised and instrumentalised in pursuit of power, shaping the trajectory of the modern Middle East and its complex state and societal dynamics.
FAQ
European colonial powers, particularly Britain and France, often exploited sectarian divisions to maintain control. They favoured Sunni elites for administrative roles, reinforcing Sunni dominance and marginalising Shi‘a communities.
In Iraq, Britain installed the Sunni Hashemite monarchy despite the Shi‘a majority, embedding sectarian imbalance into the state structure. In Lebanon, the French mandate system institutionalised sectarian representation, deepening divides.
These colonial legacies left a pattern of Sunni political dominance and Shi‘a exclusion, which shaped post-independence conflicts and power struggles across the Arab world.
Martyrdom is central to Shi‘a identity, rooted in the death of Imam Husayn at Karbala in 680 CE, symbolising resistance against injustice and tyranny.
This narrative has been repeatedly invoked to legitimise political action:
The Iranian Revolution (1979) framed opposition to the Shah as a modern Karbala.
Hezbollah uses martyrdom imagery to inspire resistance against Israel.
Shi‘a protest movements often commemorate Husayn to symbolise perseverance against oppression.
Thus, martyrdom serves not just as a religious memory but as a mobilising tool for political struggle.
Sectarian identity often guides alliance formation and geopolitical strategy. Iran, as a Shi‘a-majority state, supports Shi‘a groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen, seeking to expand its influence.
Conversely, Sunni powers like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt back Sunni governments and factions, including opposition groups in Syria.
These alignments are not purely religious — they reflect broader strategic rivalries, but sectarian affiliation frequently shapes the rhetoric and legitimacy of alliances in the region.
Sunni-majority states often base legal systems on Sunni jurisprudence (fiqh) and promote Sunni scholarship through state institutions, reinforcing Sunni dominance.
Shi‘a communities, meanwhile, maintain separate legal traditions — such as Jaʿfari law — particularly in personal status issues like marriage and inheritance. In countries like Iraq and Lebanon, dual legal systems exist to accommodate both sects.
Education also reflects sectarian divides: state curricula in Sunni-led states typically present Sunni interpretations, while Shi‘a seminaries (hawzas) in places like Najaf and Qom preserve Shi‘a intellectual traditions and leadership training.
Bahrain’s population is predominantly Shi‘a, but political power is concentrated in a Sunni monarchy. This imbalance has fuelled recurring protests, notably during the Arab Spring (2011), when Shi‘a-led demonstrations demanded political reform and equality.
The government, with Saudi support, suppressed the uprising, citing fears of Iranian interference. Bahrain illustrates how demographic realities clash with entrenched power structures and how sectarian identity intersects with demands for democracy, reform, and regional influence.
It remains one of the most visible examples of sectarian tension shaping state stability in the Middle East.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks):
What was the primary cause of the split between Sunni and Shi‘a Islam?
Mark Scheme:
1 mark for identifying that the split was caused by a dispute over leadership succession after the death of the Prophet Muhammad.
1 mark for specifying the two sides: Sunnis believed leadership should be chosen by consensus, while Shi‘a believed it should pass to Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law.
Question 2 (6 marks):
Explain how Sunni–Shi‘a relations have influenced political power structures in two Arab states since 1945.
Mark Scheme:
Up to 2 marks for identifying relevant examples of states (e.g. Iraq, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Syria).
Up to 2 marks for explaining how Sunni dominance shaped governance (e.g. Sunni minority rule in Iraq under Saddam Hussein, suppression of Shi‘a opposition in Saudi Arabia).
Up to 2 marks for explaining how Shi‘a activism or resistance influenced politics (e.g. Shi‘a uprisings in Bahrain, post-2003 Shi‘a-led government in Iraq)